Skip to content

Marc-Andre Fleury dismal in Penguins' loss

Apr 14, 2010, 9:45 PM EDT

fleurybad.jpgThere’s no doubt in my mind that the Penguins’ ugly 5-4 loss to the Senators can be placed on Marc-Andre Fleury’s shoulders. Sure, the team didn’t look particularly sharp, but Fleury allowed hare brained goal after hare brained goal, castrating Pittsburgh’s spirits and letting a similarly unimpressive Brian Elliott off the hook.

As Brandon said, Fleury’s rebound control was horrendous. It’s not as if Ottawa’s superstars controlled the game, either; the Senators benefited from a goal each from Chris Neil, Chris Kelly and Jarkko Ruutu.

I hate to say it,  but while this was an unusually bad performance by Fleury, the goals he allowed seemed all-too-familiar. The 2003 No. 1 overall pick gave up some awful goals against the Red Wings early in the Stanley Cup Finals (two words: Justin Abdelkader) and belched out a few embarrassing early goals in the epic Capitals series to boot.

It’s funny how a Stanley Cup can heal all wounds, because Fleury wasn’t nearly as sharp in 08-09 (90.8% save percentage and a 2.67 GAA) as he was in 07-08 (93.3% save percentage and a 1.97 GAA). I’m not saying he was (or is) horrible, he’s just a notch – or a few notches – below “elite.”

Whatever way you slice it, the Penguins need a better performance from their franchise goalie.

  1. Kris Campbell - Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM

    why do i never see headlines like “kris letang plays godawful in penguins loss”?

  2. got stanley? - Apr 14, 2010 at 10:31 PM

    I don’t think this one was all on Flower, though certainly some of it is. The whole Pens D looked sloppy, allowing multiple looks at Fleury around the crease on several occasions and not clearing the Senators out of the crease.

Featured video

Bettman hears the boos in Philly
Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. P. Subban (2147)
  2. R. Vrbata (1690)
  3. C. Giroux (1636)
  4. S. Crosby (1608)
  5. C. Schneider (1570)