Apr 9, 2010, 3:45 PM EDT
Look, the shootout was an absolutely adorable little confection coming out of the lockout. It was a cutesy way for the league to avoid the dreaded “kissing sister” effect* while also giving fans a final jolt of excitement at the end of the games – certainly a worthwhile endeavor considering the oozing wounds left behind by the lockout. But, come on people, it’s been five long seasons and it’s time to acknowledge the fact that there’s a mountainous difference between a real win and a win in that glorified skills competition.
Many level-headed individuals have hatched sensible solutions. Some want a system that awards 3 points for a regulation or overtime win, 2 points for a shootout win and 1 for a regulation or overtime loss. Others would just prefer to revert to the old system of 2 points for a regulation win, 1 point for losing in OT/kissing your sister* and none for losing normally.
* – It’s probably relevant to point out that kissing your sister means ending a game in a tie. We here at PHT do not endorse incest or any of its by-products.
Well, you know what? In this case I call shenanigans on all of those solutions. That’s right: those ideas are Hogwash. Balderdash!
Instead, the league needs to roll up its sleeves and be men (or adults?) about this one. I’m simply tired of sports teams getting away with playing not to lose. So what do I propose? If you win, you get whatever points the league wants. Why? Because you get nothing for a tie. You get nothing if you lose. You win or you get NOTHING.
Yup, that’s right. The real solution is to simply go for an all-or-nothing approach. Can you imagine how much more exciting hockey could be if teams had no choice but to actually go for the win (instead of trying to hold on for a tie or the coin flip that is a shootout)? Maybe teams would still go into trap mode, but at least they wouldn’t be encouraged to play coward hockey all the time.
Now, I acknowledge that this is a fairly bold solution, but I think that’s what makes it spectacular. After all, this is a sport in which people grow beards for good luck. That’s just awesome, folks. However, I imagine that there are plenty of dissenters out there so I’m willing to be proven wrong. What do you think the league should do to curb its ever-increasing trend of teams settling for charity points? Vote in the poll below. Heck, you can even try to come up with something I hadn’t considered if you’re feeling especially frisky.
- Lindros, LeClair and Desjardins to be inducted into the Flyers Hall of Fame 23
- It’s back! PHT’s Team of the Day summer series starts tomorrow 5
- Pens sign Spaling — two years, $4.4 million 12
- Agent: Subban hasn’t told me to make him NHL’s highest-paid D 30
- Devils sign Greene to five-year, $25M extension 18
- Subban seeking $8.5 million in arbitration, versus the Habs at $5.25 million 46
- Marchand on Plekanec: ‘I hate him. I can’t stand him’ 59
- Gettin’ paid: Gardiner inks five-year, $20.25M extension with Leafs 15
- Report: Trottier to join Sabres’ coaching staff 21
- Blues sign former eighth overall pick Mueller 31
- Cashing in: Rangers sign Brassard to five-year, $25 million deal (63)
- Marchand on Plekanec: ‘I hate him. I can’t stand him’ (59)
- Subban seeking $8.5 million in arbitration, versus the Habs at $5.25 million (46)
- Trotz plans to let Johansson, Kuznetsov, and Burakovsky compete for time at center (45)
- Richards: If not for the cap, half the league would want to play for Hawks (36)