Apr 2, 2010, 7:45 AM EDT
I don’t believe in conspiracy theories, although I understand that
there are a number of fans throughout the NHL that are convinced that
their team has a target on it’s back. The Red Wings fall into this
category, based on the fact on the number of controversial calls that
have gone against Detroit the past few years that have taken goals away.
Nevermind the fact that the Red Wings are the most successful franchise
of the past 20 years and have won four Stanley Cups in that time.
Now, we have a controversial call that has gone in favor of the Red
Wings, and one that continues their incredible hot streak headed in to
1:13 into the third period, with the Red Wings leading Columbus 2-1,
Todd Bertuzzi looked to have scored to give Detroit a 3-1 lead. The
officials immediately called off the goal off, then went to Toronto for
further review. The referees supposedly originally called the goal off
based on Bertuzzi kicking the puck in, and on replays it showed the puck
definitely going in off his skate.
“It’s a really sad state of affairs if that’s the winning goal,” Blue
Jackets coach Claude Noel said. “You can see for yourself.”
After the jump, video of the goal and a debate over Bertuzzi’s soccer
“No, not me. I don’t think I’m good enough to do something like that.
Every once in a while you get some lucky bounces and that was one of
them,” Bertuzzi said. “It ended up being pretty important. … I was just
going to the net and got hit. Z (Zetterberg) made a good play getting it
to the net. There was contact. Hit the back of my skate and went in.”
Normally when a goal is called off for being kicked, it comes with a
very distinct kicking motion and usually as the player is ‘braking’ as
they crash the net. They’ll direct their skate forward in order to
direct the shot or try and sweep the puck in the direction of the net.
These fall under ‘distinct kicking motions’. But what about when the
puck is kicked off the heel of the skate, backwards?
Here’s the game highlights from Detroit’s 3-2 win. The replay of the
goal starts at 4:45.
It certainly appears that his skate was coming down, just as the puck
went off his heel. But was it a ‘distinct kicking motion’? Normally,
when one thinks of kicking it’s in a forward direction. I don’t think
we’ve ever seen a player deliberately bank a shot off the back of his
skate before, which if done on purpose is one heck of a feat. That’s
like swinging a bat backwards at a 60 mph pitch.
Good goal or not?
There really is no precedent for this sort of ‘kick’ and the officials
in Toronto determined that it was not a deliberate, distinct kick. More
like blind luck than anything.
What are your thoughts?
- Quenneville gets $25,000 fine for ‘bush-league move’ 7
- NHL looking into Quenneville’s ‘grabby’ gesture from Game 1 40
- Getzlaf to play Game 2, looks awful 17
- Video: PHT Extra — can Detroit exploit Boston’s blueline? 12
- Sharks go on the attack, defeat Kings in Game 1 16
- Avalanche win in OT, complete third-period comeback 61
- Blues prevail in longest game in franchise history as Steen scores in third OT 25
- Video: Sharks’ Brown runs Voynov into Quick, scrum ensues 2
- Opportunistic Rangers pull away from Flyers, take 1-0 series lead 64
- WATCH LIVE: Minnesota Wild at Colorado Avalanche (Game 1) 1