<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NHL Playoffs Update: Chicago keeps stumbling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/31/nhl-playoffs-update-chicago-keeps-stumbling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/31/nhl-playoffs-update-chicago-keeps-stumbling/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2late2matter</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/31/nhl-playoffs-update-chicago-keeps-stumbling/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2late2matter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=595#comment-1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment for Brandon re. his &quot;aged, tired&quot; Detroit RW&#039;s:
What?  A 5th place Western conference playoff spot is even suggested [by you] as a RW possibility?  I&#039;d venture the Stanley Cup as the dessert.  All of a sudden the aged team is looking experienced instead.  Or was this a &quot;misread&quot; Worley?  Comment?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment for Brandon re. his &#8220;aged, tired&#8221; Detroit RW&#8217;s:<br />
What?  A 5th place Western conference playoff spot is even suggested [by you] as a RW possibility?  I&#8217;d venture the Stanley Cup as the dessert.  All of a sudden the aged team is looking experienced instead.  Or was this a &#8220;misread&#8221; Worley?  Comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
