Mar 20, 2010, 6:30 PM EDT
New York Rangers GM Glen Sather can often be a walking punchline. He gave superstar contracts to decidedly normal players such as Bobby Holik and Chris Drury. Few will forget the draft blunder that was Hugh Jessiman.
Still, there might be some faint signs of competence in the last year of so. After somehow tricking the Canadiens to trade for Scott Gomez’s awful contract, I wasn’t crazy about his signing of Marian Gaborik. He is working out at the moment, but the extremely injury prone sniper could end up being a $37.5 million mistake. When healthy, though, Gaborik is a significant upgrade over the Alaskan playmaker Gomez. In a stunning second beneficial trade, Sather traded for Olli Jokinen’s contract (which will open up $5.25 million when the Finn’s contract expires).
Long story short, the team’s situation is slightly improved but still murky. Let’s take a quick snapshot of the team’s 2010-11 cap scenario.
The Rangers’ 2010-11 cap commitments (some amounts rounded up for simplicity)
Forwards (8 of 12 needed): Gaborik ($7.5 million); Drury (7.05); Callahan (2.3); Avery (1.94); Dubinsky (1.85); Voros (1); Anisimov (822k); Boyle (525k)
Defense (4 of 6): Redden (6.5); Rosival (5); Gilroy (1.75); Del Zotto (1.09)
Goalies: (1 of 2): Lundqvist (6.88)
Cap space: about $12.82 million
Follow the jump for some analysis of the Rangers’ cap situation.
The number one priority for the Rangers’ off-season has to be re-signing Marc Staal. After looking over some stat comparisons at Dobber Hockey, Staal is the team’s defensive time on ice leader, one of its main penalty killers and continues to improve offensively (23 points so far) despite getting very little time on the PP.
So how much can Staal get? Your guess is as good as mine. Let’s say Staal’s cap hit works out to $4 million. That would give the Rangers about $8 million to allocate to one goalie, one defenseman and four forwards. Unless they manage to get rid of Redden, Rosival and/or Drury, the best the Rangers can hope for is a mid-range forward.
Like I said, the Rangers must depend heavily upon young, cheap players with all the dead weight on their roster. Things are still a bit bleak for MSG’s favorite hockey team, but at least things are better than they were last year.
- Kings’ Quick ‘didn’t have to work hard’ in shutout win over Sharks 4
- Discuss: Kings dominate Game 5, one win away from Western Conference final 18
- Discuss: Red Wings take 3-1 series lead 38
- Discuss: Rangers stay alive with OT win 71
- What they’re saying about the Avs hiring Patrick Roy 6
- It’s official: Colorado names Roy sixth head coach in franchise history 46
- Couture accuses Kings captain Brown of diving 38
- Three reasons why the Rangers might buy out Richards 26
- Richards made a healthy scratch for Game 4 35
- Don Cherry: Canucks GM Gillis threw coaches ‘under the bus’ 28
- Report: NHLPA director Fehr wants to address issue of fighting (113)
- Question for commenters: What, if anything, needs to be done about the officiating? (101)
- Discuss: Bruins rally in third, take 3-0 series lead (99)
- Discuss: Detroit takes 2-1 series lead vs. Chicago (95)
- Video: Crosby scores hat trick, hits playoff milestone against Senators (91)
- Watch LIVE: Sharks-Kings, Game 5
- PHT: Wings push Hawks to brink of elimination
- PHT: Kreider keeps Rangers alive | Highlights
- PBT: Hibbert says Battier's knee to groin intentional
- OlyTalk: Lochte says Phelps will return soon
- CSN: Francona returns to Boston | Legacy?
- Posnanski: Hornets more than a name to Charlotte
- Play Video: Highlights: Kings beat Sharks, take series lead
- Play Video: Brown takes out goalie Niemi
- Play Video: Demers commits reckless penalty
- Play Video: Demers slashes Doughty, but no call made
- Play Video: Niemi robs Carter to preserve tie
- Play Video: Highlights: Wings take 3-1 series lead over 'Hawks