<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicago and Washington: Rising to the top</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/14/chicago-and-washington-rising-to-the-top/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/14/chicago-and-washington-rising-to-the-top/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LemmywinksNorthernPublius</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/14/chicago-and-washington-rising-to-the-top/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LemmywinksNorthernPublius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=287#comment-466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have any updated numbers, but as of a couple days ago, the Southeast division has actually taken more points (97) from games vs. the Atlantic division, than vice versa (96).
Does it mean the Southeast isn&#039;t the worst division? Who knows - but I think it does support the argument that the Southeast looks poor partially because of how absolutely dominant the Caps have been.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any updated numbers, but as of a couple days ago, the Southeast division has actually taken more points (97) from games vs. the Atlantic division, than vice versa (96).<br />
Does it mean the Southeast isn&#8217;t the worst division? Who knows &#8211; but I think it does support the argument that the Southeast looks poor partially because of how absolutely dominant the Caps have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dcsportsfan</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/14/chicago-and-washington-rising-to-the-top/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dcsportsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=287#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say what you will about the quality of play in the se, but the caps have taken 75% of available points against the atl division, 67% vs ne, 60% vs central, 75% vs ne, and 58% vs pac.  In fact, the caps have garnered 63% vs the west which is just about the same as Chicago vs the east, 65%.  The caps have not just feasted on the se division in order to reach the top of the league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you will about the quality of play in the se, but the caps have taken 75% of available points against the atl division, 67% vs ne, 60% vs central, 75% vs ne, and 58% vs pac.  In fact, the caps have garnered 63% vs the west which is just about the same as Chicago vs the east, 65%.  The caps have not just feasted on the se division in order to reach the top of the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
