Skip to content

Will Blackhawks' goaltending hold them back?

Mar 7, 2010, 8:00 AM EDT


Chicago Blackhawks vs Detroit Red Wings
12:30 p.m. EST – Sunday, March 7, 2010
Live on NBC

Blackhawks, behind the renewed ownership and team approach of Rocky
Wirtz, have rebuilt their team over the past few seasons and are on the
cusp of contending for the Stanley Cup. They have the best defensive
corps in the NHL, a potent offense and a team predicated on young talent
that are just now entering the prime of their careers. Yet all season long it’s been a comedy of errors in net for the Hawks, as stellar defense has covered up the shortcomings of the Chicago goaltending.

This issue is obvious to everyone but the Blackhawks themselves. They made the choice to stay quiet at the deadline, deciding that the tandem of Antti Niemi and Cristobal Huet are perfectly fine for the team to rely on for the playoffs.

This does not pass the eyeball test, however. Anyone who has watched the Hawks this season knows that the goaltending is the biggest (and perhaps only) issue with this team. The netminding is a joke and the fact that the team decided not to address the issue at the trade deadline will be what keeps this team from realizing their postseason dreams.

The goals-against doesn’t
tell the story.

When arguing that the Hawks
goaltending situation is far from the dire situation most think it is,
experts call upon the NHL-best 2.36 goals-against average. However, that
number is not a result of great goaltending — in fact, that stat
exists in spite of the goaltending. Cristobal Huet, the Blackhawks
starter this season, has a 2.32 goals-against yet an atrociously low
save percentage of .900 (37th in NHL). His backup, Antti Niemi, fares
just a bit better with a .910 save percentage (27th in NHL), but this is
far from the level of goaltending you’d want or expect from a Stanley
Cup contending team. The save percentage is a much better example of the effectiveness of a team’s goaltenders; when the team in front of you is sacrificing their bodies to block shots and make great defensive plays, it’s embarrassing when the goaltenders can barely stop 90% of the shots that do make it through.

The Hawks may be winning now,
but offense won’t come as easy in the playoffs.

the argument is that the Hawks defense, superb puck possession and
offense will cover up for the goaltending in the playoffs, just as it
has all season long. Yet once a team gets deep in the playoffs, scoring
comes at a premium. Teams that have made it to the conference finals and beyond need, not only stellar defense, but great goaltending as well. It’s the old adage: defense wins championships. Great offense is an incredible tool to have, but what happens when you’re playing the top defensive teams when it matters most. Scoring 4-5 goals a game can no longer be counted upon, especially if you’re facing the San Jose Sharks or the Colorado Avalanche. Speaking of whom, both those teams have goaltenders that are not only not allowing goals — but are stopping the majority of the shots that come their way. It’s not a foreign concept. Well, maybe to the Hawks it is.

What about Detroit last season?

2008-09 Red Wings are a prime example of a team getting to the finals
despite their goaltending. Starter Chris Osgood and backup Ty Conklin
combined for a sub-.900 save percentage on the season — in fact Chris
Osgood had the worst save percentage (.887) of any regular starter in
the NHL. Yet they made it to the finals, and were within one goal in Game 7 of winning a second straight Stanley Cup. When the playoffs
started, however, Osgood was once again able to turn it on and manage a .926 save percentage; an incredible turn around from the regular season. This propelled the Wings to the finals as great goaltending combined with stellar defense is supposed to do in the postseason.

Huet have the ability to turn it on in the postseason?

Chris Osgood has won multiple Stanley Cups and has been
playing in the NHL since 1995. He had the experience necessary to know
how to buckle down once the playoffs started. Does Cristobal Huet have
that same ability? In 2006 with the Canadiens he won just two games in a six-game series, yet had an entirely respectable 2.33 goals-against and
.929 save percentage.

The Hawks allow a NHL-low 24.2
shots per game — that doesn’t mean much when the goaltending is
allowing 2-3 goals per game on limited shots. Huet has allowed five
goals on 29 shots in the past two games combined; the Hawks have won
them both.

Chicago is dead set on the notion that they can win this season and in the playoffs based on scoring
and stellar defense alone.The numbers say otherwise.

  1. NHLWLD - Mar 7, 2010 at 2:08 PM

    Pierre needs to tell the truth. Commenting on poor goaltending for both teams. Last I checked Hawks scored on a goal bouncing off of Rafalski and Filppula coughing the puck up back in the slot with a wicked shot from Ladd up and under the cross bar. Did I miss something Pierre? Granted Huet struggled a little but where is the heart from the Blackhawks players? Not seeing it.
    And another thing Byfuglien was in the paint. His butt hit Howard in the paint and his right skate was in the paint. And no I am not a Wings fan just calling it like I see it.

  2. jennifer - Mar 8, 2010 at 2:10 PM

    Every single time I see stories on goaltending, it makes me cringe – but yes, I still have to read them :)
    Although the numbers (GAA, Save Percentage, etc) are usually accurately stated by the writers, it does not tell the whole story. There is no “goaltending break”. A goalie (amateur or professional) can have 30 shots on goal – no screened shots, directly shot at his chest and get a shut out. His numbers are going to look fantastic. Then you can a goalie who has 20 shots on goal, 3 go in. All 20 shots on goal could have been incredible!! And this goalie could have been standing on his head, with no help in front of him.. but those numbers are going to look bad.
    Hockey is a TEAM sport. Pointing out a position as being weak on a team, only berates the entire team. Goaltending is not weak on ANY NHL team. Are there bad goals? Yes. Are there great goals? Yes. Are there bad games? Ofcourse. But, every person on that roster pushes to be there and with that, deserves to be there. A few bad plays by one player, can be made up by another. The destiny of ANY championship team is not made up of who is in the net for the games, but the players who are playing together and working together – as a team. Just my two cents :)

  3. julia - Mar 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM

    Our goaltending is Brutal. We really missed the boat by not acting out a trade by March 1st. Hockey is a team sport..but without a good goaltender your totally fucked. Goaltender’s make and break games. This is the NHL not some squirt AAA team, therefore our goalie’s should be on TOP of their game. We shouldn’t have to keep trading goalies, overloading the offense just to score more goals because our talentless goalies can’t stop a beach ball. Just saying.

Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. P. Kane (1965)
  2. P. Kessel (1626)
  3. M. Richards (1395)
  4. N. Backstrom (1211)
  5. M. Giordano (1182)